tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2495360984326217501.post8566322054040800397..comments2023-11-03T00:55:59.817-07:00Comments on shower in the dark: trajectory of categoriesSequoia Haxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01374334540135770141noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2495360984326217501.post-16766704931877234332010-02-25T13:19:23.572-08:002010-02-25T13:19:23.572-08:00hi there everyone. I'm really into shoes and I...hi there everyone. I'm really into shoes and I was looking as far as something that meticulous brand. The prices seeking the velcros are around 240 bucks everwhere. But finally I set this location selling them as a remedy for half price. I exceptionally like these [url=http://www.shoesempire.com]prada sneakers[/url]. I will probably buy them. what can you say about it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2495360984326217501.post-57979783188594992522008-02-10T15:34:00.000-08:002008-02-10T15:34:00.000-08:00I don't know what rel/rev attributes are (could yo...I don't know what rel/rev attributes are (could you please elaborate?) but there are non-human-required ways of doing this. Possibilities include being able to search for: 1) one-way vs. reciprocal links (there might be a difference between a one-way link, and a link that links back to its source, e.g. with trackbacks); 2) links to an index page vs. links to elsewhere on a website (links to a homepage are presumably more general than links elsewhere); 3) whether links are embedded in text vs. listed in a side/nav bar (presumably if in a side/nav bar, they are somehow affiliated or being advertised). These distinctions wouldn't necessarily indicate the strength (spectrum) or type (typology) of the link - although 1) and 3) might - but they might help characterize it beyond the mere fact that it exists (binary).Sequoia Haxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01374334540135770141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2495360984326217501.post-12584696683530541462007-12-23T14:36:00.000-08:002007-12-23T14:36:00.000-08:00Does your typology category encompass the relation...Does your typology category encompass the relationship between links? I'm thinking specifically of things like the microformats based on the rel and rev attributes (rel-license, rel-nofollow, VoteLinks, etc.) I think capturing link relationships is a pretty hard problem (unless you have a human to read the context in which the links appear).Arthur Klepchukovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11142685792097246688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2495360984326217501.post-68001079859195900712007-12-13T13:32:00.000-08:002007-12-13T13:32:00.000-08:00And the obvious example: information. Access to i...And the obvious example: information. Access to information, great! (Binary.) Wait, um, how good is the information? (Spectrum.) Actually, what type of information? (Typology.) Answering this last question will help address the storage problem.Sequoia Haxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01374334540135770141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2495360984326217501.post-14666208731145238412007-12-12T16:41:00.000-08:002007-12-12T16:41:00.000-08:00Other examples of the trajectory of categorization...Other examples of the trajectory of categorization:<BR/><BR/>-blogs: blogs vs. traditional journalism (binary) --> degree to which a blog adheres to standards of traditional journalism (spectrum) --> different types of blogs/journalistic media, which may/may not adhere to journalistic standards (typology)<BR/><BR/>-virtual communities: virtual communities vs. real communities (binary) --> virtual communities are less real (or less something) than real communities (spectrum) --> different types of communities, online and/or off (typology)<BR/><BR/>-virtual worlds: virtual worlds vs. real world (binary) --> degree to which a world is real/virtual (spectrum) --> different types of worlds, real and/or virtual (typology)<BR/><BR/>Actually, the trajectory of categorization doesn’t only apply to emerging technologies, but to concepts and other intangible phenomena:<BR/><BR/>-public spheres: inside vs. outside the public sphere (binary) --> degree of public-ness of sphere (spectrum) --> typology of spheres, and of public spheres (typology)<BR/><BR/>-noopolitik: noopolitik vs. realpolitik (binary) --> degree of noo-ness/realness of politik (spectrum) --> typology of politiks whether noo, real, and/or otherwise<BR/><BR/>-civic participation: yes/no civic participation (binary) --> degree of civic participation (spectrum) --> types of civic participation (typology)Sequoia Haxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01374334540135770141noreply@blogger.com